Introducing… the Technical Mortgage

In Agile circles, the bogeyman of Technical Debt – that stuff you incur by not doing it right the first time, pops up whenever you talk about taking shortcuts in the development process.  And most of the time, I would tend to agree.  Fixing stuff once you are in maintenance mode often is a lot more expensive – especially major design flaws that cross cut throughout an entire application.  For example, the cost to untangle the 1st and 2nd layers of a multi-tier application is often very expensive, perhaps in some cases more expensive than starting from scratch.  The case against technical debt, is often, a good one, especially if that technical debt carries a high “interest rate” (as in, the debt will cost a lot more down the road than the benefits cost today).

That said, and I ask this as a question, is there such a thing as “low interest rate technical debt” – or what I like to call, a “technical mortgage“?  I ask this, because often, getting something, anything, that looks like it might be done is vastly more important than making it perfect.  A good starting example would be the “functional prototype”.  Most prototypes are designed to be thrown away.  It could be said, in theory, that prototype development is akin to technical mortgage – as in – you have something that looks quasi-right at prototype stage, but you are likely going to rewrite a lot of it.  There could be other cases where “fast” is more important than “good”.

Hence, my definition of technical mortgage – that is, techincal debt taken on specifically for the purpose of speeding up delivery of a software artifact, when the sponsors of the project agree to the interest rate (aka the risk) that the technical debt represents.  While it can be heresy to many people – especially well intentioned people who want to do nothing but a great job, the fact of the matter is that there are situations where the client WANTS us to do a technical mortgage, and it is our duty as consultants to a.) advise them on the risk and b.) if they accept the risk, indulge the request.

About these ads
Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  • By Technical Fraud « The Nomadic Developer on June 5, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    […] debt, by itself, is not a bad thing.  Technical debt, as I have pointed out in the past, can be seen as leverage – which in software, allows us to get a prototype up and running […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 30 other followers

%d bloggers like this: